From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from mail-ed1-f45.google.com (mail-ed1-f45.google.com [209.85.208.45]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B23581F5E0 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 12:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=B1PYw4EI; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by mail-ed1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e5e8274a74so4471136a12.1 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 05:57:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742648277; x=1743253077; darn=public-inbox.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0owRKguJX0vmKzGbBSP18+BtQGuEIKajb9qZZd4zW2s=; b=B1PYw4EIWYdOHpA4/+brJ0cGg8QTFg17IC01wv0n20XW/ndOr4vdU3c0fn8VoL3KYr yDZwJC44YAu+dXwcron/xh2RwdGPl52I0R6nDCVfaMqsvLlkNfxP7VLTnKoKXS/bGLXC 6+CiQi86wmRZCGS6cQMY8/SePhAjiVpXXIEtZ8aFJREUNMF298iMrQGoi+sHxN6gFDIL kCI9a+6rOwvuavwRcKFIoxZONdwVOeXLimCGKIgVSQhebBWUd6bnfN/HMeg60eKw1PQ4 hN+5TvLKO/ynzysCGkyQr3hexuY/xHZekfHMxShHNqDzy5cCIww1Ko8gQl4D8fyr1jdj 0tDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742648277; x=1743253077; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0owRKguJX0vmKzGbBSP18+BtQGuEIKajb9qZZd4zW2s=; b=O9H/oQvRcELN2uIqWuEfX1b0ArzYhmMdxpLgtNrCxAx9IZyqtEuo/FgnbuWG75BN0N 6v0CRXoFTI96EUT+tUENRtawP2R9wfsg6n7Ka3YaKust2Kp3TsrSUvxJCLWTxZ9KH0h5 qFplwQxmuCrgGth/Q1yeKwdQNZlf6WzgmbvRWegDSJ/tE01iaritGBQP4FZQ5LZllhBg Zx16rXXaw2wKV0lwr/O61CfXTn62pW6q+orzb3rCZ4O1FJnymht5K5vsKun62vn8urYl ZMyKwvscWEAVDwzIoJu4isX5xtn0JYwrCDU92pYw7CixdyDAqfn4fa40h+6672UQO4XT YhlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwYlgGbSafDtDxxqbZciQuN5824UJG2J/FATDWYlcRr2rMDgUhN ikCmiH6YxiWj8zuWNJQSLTl7gZK6fvyMHyK1BAuPf9m4c4Rbn5u7PiqeK/8jr77xqW6AU0mTkpZ Mcp0KoCTdTBltGL0nPaaZQyMbMnM5iEOd X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnculpmxS6PjtfGuJovqJRdrjAfZH1V86CCzjkzYWdAx8GblusWLMhS55NEvSi63 JWUQ8XGqQbinIn7kw5+FTR8Tv7VoBlS/AqieFQ2x6sBhoZK/x3kSXm7R8a3S8cxEejwchVIJg1K tOONK0o9jBgW9rbZ6HEtqOi2WA2Qw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHYIOPZCnh5xsP+nik7qVPi0jFE/6CKX/4lI1S8f8O4GNuZJTl1bVqw3LodOSY8HzIsD5zshC0dhZnwSqHUKAY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1e91:b0:5e6:17d7:9a32 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5ebcd46a367mr6019141a12.18.1742648276904; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 05:57:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Josh Ponelat Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 14:57:45 +0200 X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1Jo5GrHr8jbodyd6kjQfNKI-5Xmt5ixRSMw_8_A-zU0bpGLxAq7fEjjIq9o Message-ID: Subject: Re: Testing for RFC purposes To: test@public-inbox.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: Replying using web email client. On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 at 14:41, Josh Ponelat wrote: > > Testing to see if public-inbox is a good candidate for internal RFC > processes, that are transparent and simple. > > Regards, > J