* Testing for RFC purposes
@ 2025-03-22 12:41 Josh Ponelat
2025-03-22 12:57 ` Josh Ponelat
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Josh Ponelat @ 2025-03-22 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: test
Testing to see if public-inbox is a good candidate for internal RFC
processes, that are transparent and simple.
Regards,
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Testing for RFC purposes
2025-03-22 12:41 Testing for RFC purposes Josh Ponelat
@ 2025-03-22 12:57 ` Josh Ponelat
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Josh Ponelat @ 2025-03-22 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: test
Replying using web email client.
On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 at 14:41, Josh Ponelat <jponelat@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Testing to see if public-inbox is a good candidate for internal RFC
> processes, that are transparent and simple.
>
> Regards,
> J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-22 12:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-22 12:41 Testing for RFC purposes Josh Ponelat
2025-03-22 12:57 ` Josh Ponelat
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).