From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jponelat@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com (mail-ed1-f46.google.com [209.85.208.46])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C27D01F5E0
	for <test@public-inbox.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 12:41:35 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=VOSgNO7p;
	dkim-atps=neutral
Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e5c9662131so4382861a12.3
        for <test@public-inbox.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 05:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742647293; x=1743252093; darn=public-inbox.org;
        h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject
         :date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=PMckS8hy4nNj/b7d89nSW/oyYhmvLl2kyG/GtbSpSgY=;
        b=VOSgNO7pkdYGMz5v9Y4e1A7yHhAwLNJq6dVVL/699SI00Eh41vKc0m+9lNhQdHVDdi
         Dk0tIIZpD/lI8MI8WYSozm2L19OwREf05DADvPhH0jKI/dlUt5WPGWkS3OhioEbEVFHS
         +UKX5977ZKIb60tBFBczULKglpDBALnRVrv2V/90e7AUJpxcww9SUduhd/AFY+mm5rpb
         BgcF1gRTRJofoGmBrjkHMuIxpTtiyxMahfZz9e97n/3SGZBJmsydxDSpf1+v4gjZ0Lsa
         PiNNP70DHDKOyERUVOHfdQ8R5+58naWmZbQVoVHq42GL/zIFtmhBrgzRWO3CymRFBk2x
         /vuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742647293; x=1743252093;
        h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state
         :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=PMckS8hy4nNj/b7d89nSW/oyYhmvLl2kyG/GtbSpSgY=;
        b=XMuBAXmOsawK8eafrfm+HJ3GL6E9T1jL8DdJi8Iqayl+Z0Yr+42vboREXmagsinR0H
         eZDczy8Kv0RJKL2O3Wz4yfPsBOZgEEkXdk6Y4tWOI8Y4/HG97YcwzksZBdWNuD3Y9Rhv
         iy5gbP9QCOa7egQfWbj4X3+42kB67nFUvsRy2mC4gsU03Z0eB0Oq01FuTaW4kAPAO7N0
         A1nb4myoTI3ZY+HElaxfqNSyRng5JUqB+PkkqdVSDOa0N6dJFoPCU++a+3TxwX2rOIe1
         z+6XYgmlmA0gMGrwg6z8vF2q9NCInjRrE0DdCHm+TfPNb33NrCghOVTAs6iFMdbmhzsG
         5iWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx/AwHYvRooGJz2I6dWwVlQHZVjOr2jKZwfR5AOFHlCmq4Qa0Ji
	lRovreHug4NeQ7E11fmeBwIWBPAnOkJl+aueqO58ZXSXCv7Ji6HShix4SylC8/aGsQYK9FGM9rD
	C/2X/g9PwVms88Eekj/ujmMz+qvxHvaBq
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvZztSucDSgChNND1zRuPZKgUfbz5TDnh2KVDBzQgqIrdCnhwuSg3IgAnj45wj
	MoTR0h9ssLBAQvpaXXtObk63Uv+FssbQAyyAuwPnAsT5l0w/QymdFbFmL00AOnZKQy/QcYOyzoW
	3E6yX4G1zrxKP0BDEfd8CYRvESyhE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHDdNf0y/XKnrLGKL0MQFXdwS3yaU485+j75LceotreJs91F6CbSF0BTGQUDSkAL7uGSbMB3JjO7Ng1VNGECDw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:35d4:b0:5e6:466e:5866 with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5ebcd4ecdeemr5823640a12.25.1742647293356; Sat, 22 Mar 2025
 05:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Josh Ponelat <jponelat@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 14:41:22 +0200
X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1Jq5ikvs6RObph5TI8z4sC9qhL-8UFq5MtRMksRkBPrx9ji_0lX0s50Y05Y
Message-ID: <CAFG41SbdMLdd1wNNr9DavAAhxvmPGVYQxjSFbVTzOwcTNLyYpg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Testing for RFC purposes
To: test@public-inbox.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
List-Id: <test.public-inbox.org>

Testing to see if public-inbox is a good candidate for internal RFC
processes, that are transparent and simple.

Regards,
J